ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 72-78

Role of scoring systems in acute pancreatitis


Department of Surgery, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Somnath Gooptu
Department of General Surgery, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0975-2870.167994

Rights and Permissions

Background: Identification of patients at risk for severe disease early in the course of acute pancreatitis is an important step to formulating the management strategies for improving outcomes. Scoring systems designed for such assessment need critical evaluation regarding which and when to apply. Aims: To assess the efficacy of specific scoring systems like Ranson's score, Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) scoring, Acute Physiology Score and the Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), and Modified Computed Tomography Severity Index (MCTSI) to predict severity, organ failure, and complications leading to mortality in acute pancreatitis. Materials and Methods: Ranson's, APACHE II and BISAP scores were calculated within 24 h of admission. Ranson's score was evaluated also after 48 h of admission. CT scan was performed after a period of 48 h only if the clinical course was unpredictable, morphological changes were detected on ultrasound abdomen or on clinical suspicion. MCTSI was evaluated in such cases. Results: There were 48 patients with acute pancreatitis (89.6% male) of which 11 patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT scan. Six patients developed organ failure and were classified as severe acute pancreatitis. Three patients had died. Six patients had a BISAP score >3, 5 patients with Ranson's score >3, 3 patients with APACHE II >8 and MCTSI >2 was seen in 9 patients. Area under curve for BISAP, Ranson's, APACHE II, and MCTSI in predicting severity are 0.79 (confidence interval [CI]: 0.605-0.967), 0.79 (CI: 0.524-1), 0.94 (CI: 0-1), and 0.61 (CI: 0.286-0.936), respectively. Conclusion: We recommend that although APACHE II score is a better predictor of organ failure, BISAPS should be used for the identification of high-risk patients because of its simplicity. Ranson's score still holds its place in identifying patients at risk of developing severe acute pancreatitis and organ failure. MCTSI though did not perform well, but still helps to identify local and systemic complications without pancreatic necrosis. It also defines scope and extent of the surgical intervention.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2840    
    Printed27    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded311    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal