Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 268-276  

Functional paradox of leptin and adiponectin in diabetes patients and controls in the Cape Coast Metropolis of Ghana


1 Department of Medical Biochemistry, School of Medical Sciences, College of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana
2 Department of Biomedical Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana
3 Department of Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana

Date of Web Publication19-May-2017

Correspondence Address:
Samuel Acquah
Department of Medical Biochemistry, School of Medical Sciences, College of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast
Ghana
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/MJDRDYPU.MJDRDYPU_271_16

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Aim: To investigate the concept of obesity paradox in diabetes patients and nondiabetic control in the Cape Coast Metropolis of Ghana. Materials and Methods: Levels of leptin, adiponectin, total antioxidant power (TAP), lipid peroxides, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were assessed in 115 diabetics and an equal number of control respondents. Furthermore, various anthropometric indices and blood pressure were measured using standard methods. Levels of biomarkers were compared between groups based on body mass index or blood pressure classifications. Results: Control respondents exhibited higher (P < 0.05) levels of leptin, adiponectin, and TAP but lower levels of CRP and peroxides than diabetes patients. In each study group, overweight/obese respondents exhibited higher (P < 0.05) leptin level but comparable (P > 0.05) mean levels of the various biomarkers, except TAP level which was higher (P < 0.05) in the overweight/obese diabetic respondents only. Mean level of adiponectin was lower (P < 0.05) only in systolic diabetic hypertensives with comparable (P > 0.05) levels of the other biomarkers between diabetes patients and their control counterpart. Irrespective of diabetes, obesity, or hypertensive status, leptin associated positively with various measures of adiposity. Adiponectin correlated positively with leptin (R > 0.38; P< 0.05) only in the control respondents, suggesting a possible functional paradox of the adipocytokines in this group of respondents. Conclusion: Overweight/obese respondents appear metabolically healthier than their normal-weight counterparts. However, further studies are needed for proper understanding of this concept in the Ghanaian context.

Keywords: Adiponectin, C-reactive protein, leptin, obesity paradox, total antioxidant power


How to cite this article:
Acquah S, Boampong JN, Eghan Jnr BA. Functional paradox of leptin and adiponectin in diabetes patients and controls in the Cape Coast Metropolis of Ghana. Med J DY Patil Univ 2017;10:268-76

How to cite this URL:
Acquah S, Boampong JN, Eghan Jnr BA. Functional paradox of leptin and adiponectin in diabetes patients and controls in the Cape Coast Metropolis of Ghana. Med J DY Patil Univ [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Mar 25];10:268-76. Available from: http://www.mjdrdypu.org/text.asp?2017/10/3/268/206584


  Introduction Top


The health effects of obesity are mediated through the interaction among various biochemical markers such as those of inflammation, oxidative stress, and adipocytokines such as leptin and adiponectin. Indeed, fat accumulation is associated with inflammation and oxidative stress which serve as the main mechanisms through which Type 2 diabetes mellitus and other obesity-associated health conditions are established.[1],[2] The recognition of metabolic paradox in several obesity-associated health conditions has open the way for other biomarkers to be assessed in the context of overweight, obesity, and normal-weight respondents. Obesity still remains a public health challenge in both developed and developing economies. In Ghana, obesity prevalence increases from rural to urban settings.[3] The obesity paradox postulates that certain obese individuals appear to exhibit better prognostic cardiovascular disease risk than their normal-weight counterparts with similar underlying health conditions.[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10] This phenomenon, which was recognized decades ago,[11],[12] indicates that global fat accumulation per se may not be the only major driving force behind the numerous obesity-associated health conditions. Rather, the location of the accumulated fat and its interaction with other metabolic indices may also be important in the reported varied health consequences of obesity. Interestingly, the presence of the paradox in obesity does not in any way suggest that uncontrolled fat accumulation promotes health. Indeed, Arnlöv et al.[2] demonstrated that irrespective of the presence of metabolic syndrome, fat accumulation increased the risk of individuals to cardiovascular disease. In spite of this observation, the concept of paradox appears to be present in several other chronic diseases.[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[13] Several factors such as age, cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, medical treatment, nutritional status, and mortality risk have been cited as important explanations to the observed obesity paradox in several populations.[14],[15],[16],[17],[18] Scientific information in Ghana, in particular, and the Sub-Saharan Africa, in general, on obesity in relation to the paradox observed in other populations is virtually nonexistent in spite of the acknowledged impact of obesity on her populace currently and in the near future.[19] In fact, the 2015 estimates by the International Diabetes Federation suggest that the 14.2 million people living with diabetes in the Sub-Saharan Africa region are expected to rise to 34.2 million people by 2040,[19] representing an increase of over 140%, the highest in the world. Obesity has been identified as the major contributor to the predicted increased incidence of diabetes in the region. As a result, it does not come as a surprise that most research works in the Sub-Saharan Africa region tend to focus on the negative effects of obesity with little or no attention to the emerging paradox that has been observed in other populations. Considering the likely effect of the emerging obesity paradox on therapeutic, preventive, and other managerial decisions in relation to health and disease, it may be important to explore the phenomenon in Ghana to allow for targeted decisions aimed at improved management and prevention of diabetes in the country. As a result, the current study was designed to compare the levels of lipid peroxides, total antioxidant power (TAP), C-reactive protein (CRP), leptin, and adiponectin in overweight/obese and normal-weight diabetic and nondiabetic respondents in the Cape Coast Metropolis of Ghana who may be hypertensive or not.


  Materials and Methods Top


Study site, selection of study respondents, and laboratory measurements of biomarkers

The Cape Coast Teaching Hospital (CCTH) served as the site for selection of participants, blood sampling, blood pressure, weight, and height measurements. Meanwhile, laboratory determinations of serum levels of TAP, CRP, lipid peroxides, leptin, and adiponectin were carried out at the laboratory of the School of Medical Sciences, University of Cape Coast. CCTH remains the only tertiary hospital for referrals by the various health facilities in the Central Region. It has a well-organized diabetic clinic that manages diabetic patients from the various health facilities within the Cape Coast and other districts of the region. According to the 2010 Population and Housing Census report by the Ghana Statistical Service, the Central Region with an estimated annual population growth rate of 3.1% is one of the fastest growing regions in Ghana. CCTH is located in Cape Coast which serves as the capital of Central Region. Applying the regional growth rate to a population of 169,894 in 2010, Cape Coast is expected to house an estimated 197,918 people by 2015. However, 35.1% of the population is below 18 years of age. The main occupations of majority of the adult population of Cape Coast are farming, fishing, and petty trading in the informal sector with a few in the formal sector of the economy. Generally, the characteristics of inhabitants of the Cape Coast Metropolis reflect those of the entire Central Region.

In all, 230 respondents made up of 115 diabetes patients and an equal number of nondiabetic controls were enrolled in the study. Diabetics were selected at random from a pool of over 1500 registered diabetic patients attending the Diabetic Clinic at CCTH. The nondiabetic controls were selected from the inhabitants of the Cape Coast Metropolis and age-matched with their diabetic counterpart. The study was conducted between November 2011 and December 2013. Details of participants' selection regarding inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample collection, and preparation have been published elsewhere.[20],[21] Weight, height, body mass index (BMI) computation, waist circumference (WC), hip circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) calculation were in strict adherence to the WHO Expert Panel Report of 2008.[22] Body adiposity index which is considered as a superior alternative to BMI was computed from height and hip circumference based on a proposed formula by Bergman et al.[23]

Serum levels of adiponectin, leptin, and CRP were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits following the manufacturer's instructions (Assaypro Inc., St Charles, MO, USA). TAP and lipid peroxides were measured, respectively, by colorimetric and spectrophotometric techniques in accordance with instructions from the manufacturer (Oxford Biomedical Research, USA).

Ethical approval

The study received approval from the Committee on Human Research, Publications, and Ethics of the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi. In addition, every adopted protocol was in strict adherence to the Ethical Standards of CCTH, Ghana Health Service, and the World Medical Association, Declaration of Helsinki. Above all, each study participant provided a written informed consent.

Statistical analysis

Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. Diabetics and nondiabetic controls were grouped into two according to the BMI or blood pressure classifications to obtain a total of four groups which were treated as independent samples. Mean levels of the various indices were compared across groups by one-way ANOVA with Tukey Least Significant Difference post hoc test. Bivariate Pearson correlation test was applied to investigate linear associations between any pair of measured indices, followed by simple and stepwise regression analyses. Data analysis was conducted by the SPSS version 17 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). In all analyses, a P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


  Results Top


This preliminary study involved 230 respondents who were made up of 115 diabetics and 115 nondiabetic controls aged 38–80 years. Each study group was divided into normal-weight (BMI = 18.5–24.9) and overweight/obese group of respondents based on a two-stage BMI classification. Generally, nondiabetic controls had higher (P < 0.05) mean levels of leptin, adiponectin, and TAP but lower levels of CRP and peroxides than their diabetic counterpart [P < 0.05; [Table 1]. In each study group, overweight/obese respondents exhibited higher [P < 0.05; [Table 1] mean hip circumference and leptin level than their normal-weight counterpart. Mean levels of all the other indices were comparable between normal-weight and overweight/obese respondents in each study group, except the mean levels of TAP and systolic blood pressure (SBP), which were higher [P < 0.05; [Table 1] in the overweight/obese diabetic respondents only. Comparison of mean levels of measured indices of respondents in each study group using a three-stage BMI categorization, normal-weight (BMI = 18.5–24.9), overweight (BMI = 25–29.9), and obese (BMI ≥30) respondents, yielded similar results as no statistically significant (P > 0.05) difference was found between the overweight and obese respondents in respect of any of the measured indices (data not shown).
Table 1: Levels of biochemical and other anthropometric indices according to body mass index

Click here to view


In a Pearson bivariate correlation analysis, WC correlated positively with CRP (R = 0.379; P = 0.047) but negatively (R = −0.345; P = 0.022) with diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in normal-weight nondiabetic controls. In the same group, adiponectin correlated positively with leptin (R = 0.489; P = 0.004) but negatively with weight (R = −0.473; P = 0.006) as hip circumference exhibited a positive correlation with CRP (R = 0.435; P = 0.021). In subsequent multiple stepwise regression analyses, BMI and adiponectin were the independent predictors of leptin (R = 0.72, R2 = 0.518, adjusted R2 = 0.493; P< 0.001), with the module explaining 49.3% of the observed variation in leptin levels. With adiponectin as the dependent variable, weight and leptin could independently predict adiponectin (R = 0.622, R2 = 0.387, adjusted R2 = 0.355; P = 0.016), with the model accounting for 35.5% of the observed variation in adiponectin levels. CRP level was independently predicted by hip circumference (R = 0.392, R2 = 0.154, adjusted R2 = 0.132; P = 0.011), but the model could explain only about 13% of the observed variation in CRP levels in normal-weight nondiabetic control respondents.

In the overweight/obese nondiabetic control group, leptin correlated positively with adiponectin (R = 0.383; P = 0.01) and hip circumference (R = 0.385; P = 0.012) as TAP associated positively with SBP (R = 0.341; P = 0.034) and WC (R = 0.352; P = 0.022). However, stepwise regression analysis revealed hip circumference as the only independent predictor of circulating leptin level (R = 0.77, R2 = 0.635, adjusted R2 = 0.574; P = 0.018), with the model accounting for more than 57% of the observed variation.

With respect to the normal-weight diabetic respondents, Pearson correlational test revealed negative association of adiponectin with WC (R = −0.505; P = 0.033) and TAP with SBP (R = −0.548; P = 0.015). However, no variable could independently predict the other.

In the diabetic overweight/obese group, leptin associated positively with WC (R = 0.616; P< 0.001), hip circumference (R = 0.49; P = 0.002), and WHR (R = 0.298; P = 0.047) but negatively with height (R = −0.428; P = 0.002). In a multiple stepwise regression analysis with leptin as the dependent variable, WC and height emerged as the independent predictors of leptin (R = 0.764, R2 = 0.583, adjusted R2 = 0.56; P = 0.001), with the model explaining 56% of the observed variation in leptin level in this group of respondents.

When respondents were categorized by SBP, it was observed that generally, nondiabetic control respondents showed higher [P < 0.05; [Table 2] mean levels for leptin, adiponectin, BMI, hip circumference, and DBP but lower level of peroxides, WC, and WHR. In comparison, diabetic systolic hypertensives exhibited higher mean level of DBP [P < 0.001; [Table 2] but lower [P = 0.017; [Table 2] level of adiponectin than their normotensive counterpart.
Table 2: Levels of biochemical and anthropometric indices according to systolic blood pressure

Click here to view


Meanwhile, diabetic systolic normotensives showed positive association of leptin with WC (R = 0.668; P< 0.001), BMI (R = 0.596; P< 0.001), hip circumference (R = 0.61; P< 0.001), and weight (R = 0.459; P< 0.001) but negative correlation with height (R = −0.347; P = 0.022). Above all, adiponectin correlated positively with TAP (R = 0.317; P = 0.038). However, in a multiple stepwise regression analysis, adiponectin, WC, and height emerged as the independent predictors of leptin (R = 0.824, R2 = 0.679, adjusted R2 = 0.642; P< 0.001), with the model explaining 64.2% of the observed variation in leptin level.

In diabetic systolic hypertensives, leptin correlated positively with CRP (R = 0.461; P = 0.031), weight (R = 0.545; P = 0.009), TAP (R = 0.548; P = 0.008), hip circumference (R = 0.601; P = 0.006), BMI (R = 0.672; P = 0.001), and WC (R = 0.773; P< 0.001) but negatively with height (R = −0.571; P = 0.006) and adiponectin (R = −0.464; P = 0.029). A multiple stepwise regression analysis results indicated that adiponectin and WC were the only independent predictors of leptin (R = 0.899, R2 = 0.808, adjusted R2 = 0.779; P = 0.001), with the model accounting for 77.9% of the observed variation in leptin level.

With respect to systolic normotensive nondiabetic control respondents, positive association of leptin with weight (R = 0.34; P = 0.011), BMI (R = 0.482; P< 0.001), hip circumference (R = 0.538; P< 0.001), and adiponectin (R = 0.476; P< 0.001) was observed. Furthermore, CRP correlated positively with BMI (R = 0.295; P = 0.03) and hip circumference (R = 0.321; P = 0.023). Above all, BMI and adiponectin independently predicted leptin level (R = 0.724, R2 = 0.524, adjusted R2 = 0.493; P< 0.001) in this group of respondents, with the model explaining 49.3% of the observed variation in leptin level.

Interestingly, in systolic hypertensive nondiabetic controls, leptin exhibited a positive association with weight (R = 0.52; P = 0.013), BMI (R = 0.642; P = 0.001), and hip circumference (R = 0.523; P = 0.015) although BMI was the only independent predictor of leptin (R = 0.657, R2 = 0.432, adjusted R2 = 0.388; P = 0.008), with the model explaining 38.8% of the observed variation in leptin level.

Categorization of respondents by DBP revealed generally similar results [Table 3] as obtained for systolic categorization between diabetic respondents and nondiabetic control respondents in respect of levels of the various indices. Nonetheless, diastolic hypertensive diabetics had lower [P < 0.05; [Table 3] BMI and hip circumference but higher SBP than their normotensive counterpart. Although leptin correlated positively with WC (R = 0.772; P = 0.042) and BMI (R = 0.798; P = 0.018) in the diabetic diastolic hypertensive group of respondents, multiple stepwise regression analysis revealed BMI as the only independent predictor of leptin level (R = 0.802, R2 = 0.644, adjusted R2 = 0.573; P = 0.03), with the model explaining 57.3% of the observed variation in leptin level.
Table 3: Levels of biochemical and anthropometric indices according to diastolic blood pressure

Click here to view


In the diastolic normotensive diabetics, leptin associated positively with a number of indices such as WC (R = 0.69; P< 0.001), weight (R = 0.457; P< 0.001), BMI (R = 0.599; P< 0.001), hip circumference (R = 0.534; P< 0.001), and TAP (R = 0.344; P = 0.009) but negatively with height (R = −0.426; P = 0.001). However, WC and height emerged as the only independent predictors of leptin (R = 0.764, R2 = 0.583, adjusted R2 = 0.56; P = 0.001), with the model accounting for 56% of the observed variation.

With respect to the control respondents, nondiabetic diastolic hypertensives exhibited a positive correlation between CRP and BMI (R = 0.705; P = 0.023). However, weight was the only independent predictor of CRP (R = 0.71, R2 = 0.504, adjusted R2 = 0.421; P = 0.049), with the model explaining 42.1% of the observed variation in CRP levels.

In the nondiabetic diastolic normotensive respondents, leptin correlated positively with WC (R = 0.266; P = 0.038), weight (R = 0.43; P< 0.001), BMI (R = 0.563; P< 0.001), hip circumference (R = 0.563; P< 0.001), and adiponectin (R = 0.46; P< 0.001) as height correlated negatively with adiponectin (R = −0.284; P = 0.023). Meanwhile, BMI and adiponectin were the independent predictors of leptin (R = 0.72, R2 = 0.518, adjusted R2 = 0.493; P< 0.001), with the model accounting for 49.3% of the observed variation in leptin level.


  Discussion Top


Serum levels of leptin, adiponectin, CRP, lipid peroxides, and TAP have been measured in various disease conditions to assess disease severity, risk of death, or development of a given disease and effectiveness of a given treatment regimen. In the current report, serum levels of the above biochemical indices were compared between normal-weight and overweight/obese diabetic respondents and nondiabetic control respondents who were hypertensive or not, to investigate their relationship with selected anthropometric indices and explore the possibility of metabolic paradox in our setting. In general, the higher level of leptin observed in nondiabetic controls than their diabetic counterpart is in support of a number of previous studies and has been ascribed to the inhibitory effect of metformin on leptin secretion.[24],[25],[26] Indeed, metformin has been found to improve sensitivity of cells to leptin action,[27] suggesting that the relatively higher leptin levels observed in control respondents of the current study could indicate possible leptin resistance. Interestingly, the observed trend in leptin level in the current study contradicts other previous reports that found higher leptin levels in diabetes patients than controls.[24],[28] The variation in observation between the current study and the earlier ones [24],[29] could be ascribed to differences in characteristics of study respondents. For instance, the study by Morteza et al.[24] compared leptin levels of newly-diagnosed Type 2 diabetes patients with controls whereas that of Pandey et al.[28] compared obese diabetes patients with normal-weight nondiabetic controls. Indeed, when circulating leptin levels of diabetes patients with longer duration of disease were compared with controls,[24] the trend was rather similar to the current report, suggesting that the reduced circulating level of leptin in diabetes patients could probably be a reflection of long-term effect of metformin, although a similar finding in the short-term was reported over a decade ago independent of body weight and fat content in healthy respondents.[29] Irrespective of the effect of metformin or diabetes, leptin level was consistently higher in overweight/obese respondents than those with normal weight, further buttressing the view of likely leptin resistance, since leptin is an anti-obesity molecule.[30] The positive association of leptin with a number of indices of adiposity, irrespective of diabetes, hypertension, or obesity status, in our sample suggests that the anti-obesity molecule seems to be promoting lipid deposition in respondents of the current report. This lipogenic role of leptin is probably mediated through its interaction with adiponectin as the two molecules correlated positively with each other in the control respondents of the current study. This synergistic relationship between leptin and adiponectin instead of an expected antagonistic association deviates from an earlier study [31] and points to a possible functional paradox regarding the two molecules in the nondiabetic control arm of the current study. Meanwhile, the anti-obesity role of adiponectin appeared to be somehow preserved in normal-weight diabetic respondents only as the molecule correlated negatively with weight and WC in this group of respondents. Nonetheless, the comparable level of adiponectin in both weight groups coupled with the synergistic relationship with leptin and a higher TAP level in overweight/obese diabetic respondents raises doubts about the effectiveness of adiponectin's anti-obesity function.

Obesity and inflammation are tightly linked as obesity-induced inflammation underpins the development of several chronic conditions.[7],[8],[9],[10],[32] However, a direct association between CRP and WC or hip circumference was only observed in control respondents with normal weight, suggesting that increased fat deposition in this group of respondents gives rise to a corresponding increase in inflammation which could be detrimental to cellular function. Ironically, WC correlated positively with TAP in the overweight/obese control respondents. This observation which points to a possible protection of overweight/obese nondiabetic respondents in the current study against obesity-induced oxidative stress is at variance with a number of studies that have associated obesity with oxidative stress and inflammation.[33],[34] The finding also explains, at least, in part, the comparable levels of CRP and peroxides between normal-weight and overweight/obese respondents in the current study and further positions the overweight/obese group at a metabolically healthier status than their normal-weight counterparts. In the diabetic group, the observed higher level of TAP in overweight/obese respondents of the current study compared with their normal-weight counterparts gives further credence to the improved metabolic status of the overweight/obese respondents of the current study. This metabolic paradox requires further and larger study for better understanding in the Ghanaian context for improved management of obesity-related health conditions.

Hypertension has become a major health challenge for developing and developed countries globally. In Ghana, the condition is highly prevalent in both rural and urban settings and increases with age.[35] Hypertension is strongly linked with obesity as it is twice more prevalent in obese individuals compared with the general population and is associated with leptin.[36],[37],[38] However, mean leptin level did not differ between hypertensive and normotensive respondents of the present study with or without diabetes. This observation which deviates from those of earlier studies [36],[38] is in support of Imatoh et al.[37] While the deviation could be ascribed to differences in characteristics such as sample size and apparent health status of study participants between the current study and the earlier ones,[36],[38] the agreement with the findings of Imatoh et al.[37] suggests that the mean level of leptin per se may not be the only factor driving the development of hypertension in our study. This view is further buttressed by the comparable mean levels of TAP, CRP, and peroxides between normotensive and hypertensive respondents with or without diabetes. As expected, leptin associated positively with the various measures of adiposity, indicating that its effect on hypertension may be mediated through its interaction with adiposity and other adipocytokines such as adiponectin as the two adipocytokines related synergistically in control respondents of the current study with or without hypertension. A direct role of adiponectin in the development of hypertension in the current study was only evident in systolic hypertensive diabetes patients who had lower mean level of adiponectin than the normotensive counterpart in line with a recent systematic review and meta-analytic study which reported that a rise of 1.64 μg/ml adiponectin level reduces the risk of adult hypertension by 6%.[39] Interestingly, control hypertensive respondents exhibited a positive correlation between CRP and BMI, which together with the relationships among leptin, adiponectin, CRP, TAP, and lipid peroxides, and the various measures of adiposity corroborate the reported roles of inflammation, oxidative stress, and adiposity in the pathogenesis of hypertension.[37],[39],[40] Indeed, the exact effect of adiposity on hypertension in the current study differs between diabetes patients and controls depending on the basis of hypertensive classification. In systolic hypertensive controls, WC was significantly higher than normotensives whereas hip circumference and BMI were lower in diastolic hypertensive diabetics than their normotensive counterparts. Although the findings in control nondiabetic respondents corroborate several reports,[36],[41] that of diabetes patients points to a need for further studies to better understand the phenomenon in the Ghanaian context.


  Conclusion Top


Overweight/obese respondents appear metabolically healthier than their normal-weight counterpart in spite of comparable levels of most of the measured biochemical indices. Further studies are needed for proper understanding of the concept of obesity paradox in the Ghanaian setting for effective management and prevention of obesity-related health conditions.

Acknowledgement

We are very grateful to the management of UCC for funding the study. We are also grateful to the study participants, staff, and management of CCTH for the use of their facility for the study. Above all, we are deeply appreciative of the staff and management of UCCSMS, notably those responsible for the multipurpose laboratory for their countless support in ensuring the success of this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

The study was funded by a research grant from the University of Cape Coast, Ghana.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Luft VC, Schmidt MI, Pankow JS, Couper D, Ballantyne CM, Young JH, et al. Chronic inflammation role in the obesity-diabetes association: A case-cohort study. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2013;5:31.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Arnlöv J, Ingelsson E, Sundström J, Lind L. Impact of body mass index and the metabolic syndrome on the risk of cardiovascular disease and death in middle-aged men. Circulation 2010;121:230-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Agyemang C, Owusu-Dabo E, de Jonge A, Martins D, Ogedegbe G, Stronks K. Overweight and obesity among Ghanaian residents in The Netherlands: How do they weigh against their urban and rural counterparts in Ghana? Public Health Nutr 2009;12:909-16.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Lavie CJ, Alpert MA, Arena R, Mehra MR, Milani RV, Ventura HO. Impact of obesity and the obesity paradox on prevalence and prognosis in heart failure. JACC Heart Fail 2013;1:93-102.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
De Schutter A, Lavie CJ, Milani RV. The impact of obesity on risk factors and prevalence and prognosis of coronary heart disease-the obesity paradox. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2014;56:401-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
De Schutter A, Kachur S, Lavie CJ, Boddepalli RS, Patel DA, Milani RV, et al. The impact of inflammation on the obesity paradox in coronary heart disease. Int J Obes (Lond) 2016;40:1730-5.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Ortega FB, Lavie CJ, Blair SN. Obesity and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res 2016;118:1752-70.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Lavie CJ, De Schutter A, Parto P, Jahangir E, Kokkinos P, Ortega FB, et al. Obesity and prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and prognosis-the obesity paradox updated. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2016;58:537-47.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Ortega FB, Cadenas-Sánchez C, Sui X, Blair SN, Lavie CJ. Role of fitness in the metabolically healthy but obese phenotype: A review and update. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2015;58:76-86.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Lavie CJ, Sharma A, Alpert MA, De Schutter A, Lopez-Jimenez F, Milani RV, et al. Update on obesity and obesity paradox in heart failure. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2016;58:393-400.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Ruderman NB, Schneider SH, Berchtold P. The “metabolically-obese,” normal-weight individual. Am J Clin Nutr 1981;34:1617-21.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Ruderman N, Chisholm D, Pi-Sunyer X, Schneider S. The metabolically obese, normal-weight individual revisited. Diabetes 1998;47:699-713.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Lainscak M, von Haehling S, Doehner W, Anker SD. The obesity paradox in chronic disease: Facts and numbers. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2012;3:1-4.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Hainer V, Toplak H, Stich V. Fat or fit: What is more important? Diabetes Care 2009;32 Suppl 2:S392-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Oreopoulos A, Ezekowitz JA, McAlister FA, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Fonarow GC, Norris CM, et al. Association between direct measures of body composition and prognostic factors in chronic heart failure. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85:609-17.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Schenkeveld L, Magro M, Oemrawsingh RM, Magro M, Oemrawsingh RM, Lenzen M, et al. The influence of optimal medical treatment on the 'obesity paradox', body mass index and long-term mortality in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: A prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2012;2:e000535. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000535.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Heymsfield SB, Cefalu WT. Does body ma ss index adequately convey a patient's mortality risk? JAMA 2013;309:87-8.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Hainer V, Aldhoon-Hainerová I. Obesity paradox does exist. Diabetes Care 2013;36 Suppl 2:S276-81.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas. 7th ed. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Acquah S, Boampong JN, Eghan Jnr BA, Eriksson M. Evidence of insulin resistance in adult uncomplicated malaria: Result of a two-year prospective study. Malar Res Treat 2014;2014:136148.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Acquah S, Eghan BA Jr., Bawa S, Boampong JN. Differential response in lipid levels of type 2 diabetics and non-diabetic controls to falciparum malaria. Asian J Med Sci 2015;6:71-6.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
World Health Organization. Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio: Report of a WHO Expert Consultation. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Bergman RN, Stefanovski D, Buchanan TA, Sumner AE, Reynolds JC, Sebring NG, et al. A better index of body adiposity. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011;19:1083-9.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Morteza A, Nakhjavani M, Asgarani F, Ghaneei A, Esteghamati A, Mirmiranpour H. The lost correlation between leptin and CRP in type 2 diabetes. Eur Cytokine Netw 2013;24:53-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Mirza S, Hossain M, Mathews C, Martinez P, Pino P, Gay JL, et al. Type 2-diabetes is associated with elevated levels of TNF-alpha, IL-6 and adiponectin and low levels of leptin in a population of Mexican Americans: A cross-sectional study. Cytokine 2012;57:136-42.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Klein J, Westphal S, Kraus D, Meier B, Perwitz N, Ott V, et al. Metformin inhibits leptin secretion via a mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling pathway in brown adipocytes. J Endocrinol 2004;183:299-307.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Kim YW, Kim JY, Park YH, Park SY, Won KC, Choi KH, et al. Metformin restores leptin sensitivity in high-fat-fed obese rats with leptin resistance. Diabetes 2006;55:716-24.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Pandey G, Shihabudeen MS, David HP, Thirumurugan E, Thirumurugan K. Association between hyperleptinemia and oxidative stress in obese diabetic subjects. J Diabetes Metab Disord 2015;14:24.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Fruehwald-Schultes B, Oltmanns KM, Toschek B, Sopke S, Kern W, Born J, et al. Short-term treatment with metformin decreases serum leptin concentration without affecting body weight and body fat content in normal-weight healthy men. Metabolism 2002;51:531-6.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Knight ZA, Hannan KS, Greenberg ML, Friedman JM. Hyperleptinemia is required for the development of leptin resistance. PLoS One 2010;5:e11376.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Matsubara M, Maruoka S, Katayose S. Inverse relationship between plasma adiponectin and leptin concentrations in normal-weight and obese women. Eur J Endocrinol 2002;147:173-80.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Stienstra R, Tack CJ, Kanneganti TD, Joosten LA, Netea MG. The inflammasome puts obesity in the danger zone. Cell Metab 2012;15:10-8.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Fernández-Sánchez A, Madrigal-Santillán E, Bautista M, Esquivel-Soto J, Morales-González A, Esquivel-Chirino C, et al. Inflammation, oxidative stress, and obesity. Int J Mol Sci 2011;12:3117-32.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Xu H, Barnes GT, Yang Q, Tan G, Yang D, Chou CJ, et al. Chronic inflammation in fat plays a crucial role in the development of obesity-related insulin resistance. J Clin Invest 2003;112:1821-30.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Bosu WK. Epidemic of hypertension in Ghana: A systematic review. BMC Public Health 2010;10:418.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Vizjak V, Radic R, Selthofer-Relatic K, Curkovic M, Istvanic T, Buljubasic D. Plasma leptin in obesity related hypertension. Period Biol 2011;113:373-6.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Imatoh T, Miyazaki M, Momose Y, Uryu Y, Tanihara S, Une H, et al. Hyperleptinemia is associated with hypertension in Japanese males. Acta Med Okayama 2008;62:169-74.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Khokhar KK, Sidhu S, Kaur G. Correlation between leptin level and hypertension in normal and obese pre- and postmenopausal women. Eur J Endocrinol 2010;163:873-8.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Kim DH, Kim C, Ding EL, Townsend MK, Lipsitz LA. Adiponectin levels and the risk of hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension 2013;62:27-32.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Dinh QN, Drummond GR, Sobey CG, Chrissobolis S. Roles of inflammation, oxidative stress, and vascular dysfunction in hypertension. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:406960.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Russo C, Jin Z, Homma S, Rundek T, Elkind MS, Sacco RL, et al. Effect of obesity and overweight on left ventricular diastolic function: A community-based study in an elderly cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:1368-74.  Back to cited text no. 41
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed988    
    Printed14    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded81    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal